JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 22, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Jorge Isaac Banda Perez

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Entidad del sector descentralizado por servicios del orden nacional
Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Aplicación
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó al Juzgado Séptimo Civil del Circuito de Cartagena asumir de forma inmediata el conocimiento de la solicitud de tutela presentada por el ciudadano de la referencia contra la Caja de Retiro de las Fuerzas Militares, lo anterior, de conformidad a lo dispuesto en el inciso 2º del numeral 1º del Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 de 2000.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (21 points)
  1. Ordenar al juzgado
  2. Septimo. Civil del Circuito de Cartagena asumir de forma inmediata el conocimiento de la solicitud de tutela presentada por el senor Jorge Isaac Banda Perez contra la Caja de Retiro de las Fuerzas Militares.
  3. EDUARDO MONTEALEGRE LYNETT
  4. Presidente
  5. JAIME ARAUJO RENTERIA
  6. Magistrado
  7. ALFREDO BELTRAN SIERRA
  8. Magistrado
  9. MANUEL JOSE CEPEDA ESPINOSA
  10. Magistrado
  11. JAIME CORDOBA TRIVINO
  12. Magistrado
  13. RODRIGO ESCOBAR GIL
  14. Magistrado
  15. MARCO GERARDO MONROY CABRA
  16. Magistrado
  17. ALVARO TAFUR GALVIS
  18. Magistrado
  19. CLARA INES VARGAS HERNANDEZ
  20. Magistrada
  21. MARTHA VICTORIA SACHICA MENDEZ
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Alfredo Beltrán Sierra
Magistrado
✓
Alvaro Tafur Galvis
Magistrado
✓
Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez
Magistrado
✓
Eduardo Montealegre Lynett
Presidente
✓
Jaime Araujo Rentería
Magistrado
Read dissent
✓
Jaime Córdoba Triviño
Magistrado
✓
Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
Magistrado
✓
Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
Magistrado
✓
Rodrigo Escobar Gil
Magistrado
Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 2cited by 0 →A. 136A/03C-037/96 — Proyecto De Ley N°58/94 Senado Y 264/95 Camara Estatutaria De La Admon De Justicia. Exequibles E Inexequibles. · cited 1,231 timesC-037/961996A. 044/98 — Conflicto De Competencias · cited 190 timesA. 044/981998
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites2
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.